Nikon D5500 Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM Tokina 11-20mm F2.8 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm F1.8G Nikon AF-P 70-300mm F4.5-6.3G VR +1 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain
80-200 f/2.8 AF-D vs 70-200 f/4. I'll admit this is a case of not knowing exactly what I want So I have a 70-300VR as my long telephoto on my D600. I want something faster. The 70-200/4 is intriguing and caused me to even make this comparison. Let's say the choices are new 70-200/4 @ $1400, new 80-200 AF-D @ $1100 and used 80-200 AF-D @ $750
An extremely nice lens, one of the best ever made by Nikon IMO. My main reason for getting a 70-200 f4 would be for the lighter weight, and the VR would be an asset as well. . .but without sacrificing the image quality the 80-200 2.8d delivers. Of course, the 70-200 isn't a cheap lens by any means andthat's definitely a consideration.

How do you beat it? Here are some photos from previous 70-200mm f2.8 lens reviews we’ve done. Mark II The Pros and Cons of a 70-200mm f4 Lens “I don’t care about that,” is what one friend

Jan 26, 2016. Asked this question in "Beginners Questions" but did not get any response. Thought would try here as well. Price-wise: Option 1: Nikon 80-400: $2300. Option 2: Nikon 70-200/f4 + 200-500/f5.6: $1400 + $1400 = $2800. So, Option 2 is $500 costlier and buys 10mm on wide end and 100mm extra reach. Also, with Option 2 one has to carry

We’ve tested a number of f2.8 and f4 zoom lenses. For the purposes of this piece, we’re focusing on 24-70mm f2.8 and 24-105mm f4 lenses. Ergonomically speaking, they’re often made similarly .
  • 3lu8sb2h78.pages.dev/36
  • 3lu8sb2h78.pages.dev/212
  • 3lu8sb2h78.pages.dev/369
  • 3lu8sb2h78.pages.dev/156
  • 3lu8sb2h78.pages.dev/493
  • 3lu8sb2h78.pages.dev/187
  • 3lu8sb2h78.pages.dev/233
  • 3lu8sb2h78.pages.dev/164

    • nikon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8